Mar. 10th, 2008
bad science vs. no science
Mar. 10th, 2008 11:11 amI was presented with some bad science at the weekend. Second-hand report, so the details are a little fuzzy ( but it went something like this: )
you must be *this smart* to post here
Mar. 10th, 2008 07:05 pmThanks to
mopti for indirectly leading me to Bad Science; the rules for posting comments alone are worth it (although I warn you in advance that this site is worse than Wikipedia for presenting you with interesting links to follow).
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Try to be combative, intelligent, and rude, but remember these three things: personal stories about your health will always be deleted; childish personal attacks are only permitted when they are very funny; and if your post is more than one thousand words long then you are officially a loser.
You know how people always say that trying to make ISPs enforce arbitrary filtering is like trying to make a telco block obscene calls a priori? Well, Eircom are being sued for not implementing anti-downloading measures. I feel conflicted about this: eircom are, bar none, the purveyors of my worst customer service experiences; however, I feel in this issue that they are the target of a nonsensical lawsuit. I wonder if the Irish legal system supports amicus curiae-type things submitted by members of the general public?