Aug. 3rd, 2004

waider: (Default)
The past weekend's Orange Alert has almost immediately garnered a wash of undermining press, suggesting that the data is up to four years old, as opposed to discovered as part of the capture of an AQ agent last week1. You'd imagine that if it were a proper spin, this information wouldn't have been revealed by the Executive's own intelligence people. This is just the latest in a series of incidents which suggests one of several conclusions:
  • It's not spin, it's all real, and America is constantly under vague, undefined threats whose veracity the Administration is attempting to bolster for credibility's sake lest the populace get lulled into a false sense of security by Tom Ridge's constant shades of Yellow, Orange and Red;
  • It's incompetent spin, where noone's thinking more than one day - if even that - ahead of the Official Line, and Karl Rove is constantly having to fight fires;
  • It's a clever attempt to present something of the latter as the former;
  • It's lazy spin, because the administration figures that the populace and the fourth estate will eat whatever bullshit they're fed and go out and reelect Bush come November regardless.
I've pointed out to someone elsewhere that assuming the worst when it comes to judging the morals and motives of the Bush Administration is my own personal blinkered view, no less open to mockery and argument than anyone who's rigidly in the Bush-in-2004 camp. So obviously you can guess which option - or maybe options - I'm picking.

1. The capture itself had its own problems. Predicted by several left-winger publications/web logs via a Pakistani source; Happening on the weekend, but not making it to the news until right before Kerry's acceptance speech; The actual status of the captured AQ agent in terms of what he's actually done, who he is, etc. Which further adds to whatever point it is I'm trying to make.

update: Hmm. I appear to have confused one capture with another. The points about the dubious status of the captured AQ agent are correct, but don't relate to the other guy whose capture allegedly led to the Orange Alert.
waider: (Default)
I notice that lately I seem to be garnering far less comments on my lj entries. This leads me to conclude (a) I'm writing stuff that noone's interested in; (b) I'm stating the case so precisely and correctly that noone feels they have anything useful to add; (c) jeez, waider, get over yourself, I have 40 more journals to read today. I'm not put out by the lack of comments; much as I like having an audience of any size, I recognise the fact that a lot of what's here is little more than pinging noises to reassure people that I've not, as Bob put it, "been killed in some tragic accident involving alcohol, geekery, GPS and high voltage". I'm just curious as to reasons, if there are any. Feel free to, er, comment.
waider: (Default)
Thomas C. Greene makes a point that had been bouncing around in my head. Which is that, well, since so much secrecy surrounds the source of a lot of the information that the Bush Administration lean on for their terror alerts, should they not also conceal the targets, heck, even the fact that they have the knowledge, the better to pounce on Al Q when the attempts go ahead?

Profile

waider: (Default)
waider

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 29
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 12:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios