mild meta curiousity
I notice that lately I seem to be garnering far less comments on my lj entries. This leads me to conclude (a) I'm writing stuff that noone's interested in; (b) I'm stating the case so precisely and correctly that noone feels they have anything useful to add; (c) jeez, waider, get over yourself, I have 40 more journals to read today. I'm not put out by the lack of comments; much as I like having an audience of any size, I recognise the fact that a lot of what's here is little more than pinging noises to reassure people that I've not, as Bob put it, "been killed in some tragic accident involving alcohol, geekery, GPS and high voltage". I'm just curious as to reasons, if there are any. Feel free to, er, comment.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Whatever "it" is.
no subject
no subject
Being serious, or at least semi-serious, I dunno. My commenting urge arises in a pretty arbitrary fashion, so I can't predict what will prod that particular neurone. I suspect that certain types of topic, while not necessarily more interesting per se will provoke more response from the readers. For example, ISTR that you were having landlord problems and related fun experiences a while back, which seems like the kind of thing which will provoke a lot of sympathetic noises from the audience. Also, there is a point to (c): there are more people on LJ and other weblog servers these days, so the comment-urge of the reader tends to be spread a little thinner...
Oh, and what
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject