pop quiz
I've passed through this junction most weekday mornings for the last 18 months.

What you can't quite see in the photo is that the left-hand traffic signal has a green arrow indicating that you should proceed if you're turning left. Except it also has a red light, clearly not intended to convey information to people not turning left (since that's what the other visible signal is for) so what's the correct behaviour here? Note, when the lights are in this state, traffic coming from the right has a green signal for at least part of the cycle. So it can't be a carte blanche "GO", and we have a perfectly servicable flashing amber to indicate that you should proceed with caution (our local equivalent of "right turn on red", so to speak). So, WTF? WTFF?

What you can't quite see in the photo is that the left-hand traffic signal has a green arrow indicating that you should proceed if you're turning left. Except it also has a red light, clearly not intended to convey information to people not turning left (since that's what the other visible signal is for) so what's the correct behaviour here? Note, when the lights are in this state, traffic coming from the right has a green signal for at least part of the cycle. So it can't be a carte blanche "GO", and we have a perfectly servicable flashing amber to indicate that you should proceed with caution (our local equivalent of "right turn on red", so to speak). So, WTF? WTFF?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
which are pretty common all over the place.
I'm not sure I've ever seen the one on the right--a dual-purpose green that can light up either way. The thing is, if it's not that--if the green can only light up as an arrow--then I don't see why it wouldn't also be a red arrow, and why it would ever be on at the same time.
no subject
no subject