![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
turnaround
Wow. Mere days after Rumsfeld suggested contrary opinion, Dubya says there's no Saddam/9-11 link. Unequivocally. And I don't agree with the comment in that article that he was pretty much forced into it, either. There's evidence for all sorts of things contrary to the official line, why should this one item force a statement from the POTUS?
I'm impressed.
update: actually, I misread - Rummy's comments a few days ago also followed this line, mostly. They're both adhering to the "obvious links" stuff, but also both denying that Hussein had direct involvement in the WTC attacks.
I'm impressed.
update: actually, I misread - Rummy's comments a few days ago also followed this line, mostly. They're both adhering to the "obvious links" stuff, but also both denying that Hussein had direct involvement in the WTC attacks.