Entry tags:
from the "can't make this shit up" department
Apparently, and I say apparently because I got this from Sky News (think Fox News) who tend to have a "report first, ask questions later" attitude, the Americans (yes, all 250 million of them, lest there be any doubt about what I mean when I say "Americans") are complaining to Russia about the Iraqis' use of Russian-made jamming equipment. I presume they mean radio or radar jamming, as opposed to amps, guitars, and microphones. If this is true then I shall be immensely impressed with the ability of the relevant people to make such complaints with a straight face.
On-the-ground interviews with troops seem to indicate that the suspected chemical weapons factory was just an arms dump, but another location is under investigation. This is why I'm preferring the BBC coverage over most of the others; they're reporting non-favourable news with about as much weight as favourable news, which on the whole gives me the impression that it might actually be based on the truth.
On-the-ground interviews with troops seem to indicate that the suspected chemical weapons factory was just an arms dump, but another location is under investigation. This is why I'm preferring the BBC coverage over most of the others; they're reporting non-favourable news with about as much weight as favourable news, which on the whole gives me the impression that it might actually be based on the truth.

no subject
Time to reload, come to think of it.
no subject
no subject
URL might change, so go to news.bbc.co.uk and click on the link there.
no subject
I just like saying "The Royal Marines are now doing a moping up operation." Smiths records not pictured, etc.
no subject
And I don't know how unbiased the BBC is when their reports on the first bunker strike last Wednesday used the word "failure" as if that one strike was the lynchpin of the whole effort. As if Hussein was only there, and because the strikes apparently FAILED to kill him, this will be such a damaging FAILURE for the war effort, etc.
I don't think there really is unbiased news coverage here, so it's just a choice of whose stories one finds most palatable.
no subject
Regarding the BBC, I'm treating their coverage as being as close to unbiased as I can reasonably expect on the grounds that I mentioned. As loosestrife mentioned, their raw reporter feeds from the ground are pretty good - and as someone else mentioned, these reports are by necessity biased because they're coming from an unedited and possibly emotionally stressed human being in the middle of a battlefield.
Besides, what the hell are you doing still reading lame-ass retardo crap about the war?
no subject
no subject
no subject
There's your glimmer of hope; what you do with it is up to you.
no subject
Dammit.
no subject
Do I _have_ to?
(Then again, I might've misread this. Could be a plea for Fox News to START thinking.)