somewhat mixed signals
Seems to be a wide spectrum of stuff going on in the latest on those secret CIA prisons/flights. From the linked article, I have learned the following:
- Condi's going on the offensive over the whole thing to basically tell us You-Ro-Peons to stop asking awkward questions.
- An unnamed offical in a quote to the WaPo said, effectively, "we're all in this together, so shut up".
- Scott McLellan, who I can't imagine anybody believes these days ("no seriously, Scott, what colour is the sky? don't give me this "blue" crap") , says that the US is the world leader in human rights (ha!) and blah blah blah. In essence, a resounding "no, there are no secret flights/jails".
- Our own minister for the appropriate department says that Condi expects "allies to trust that America does not allow rights abuses". Note, he's not saying that he actually believes Condi on this one, which is extraordinarily spineful for a sitting Irish politician being asked awkward questions about the US
- And (I already knew this, but I'm putting it in for completeness) the main instigator of this fuss from the EU side of things is, well, the UK. You know, "special relationship between our countries" and all that.

no subject
As I understand it, the UK isn't the main instigator, but some of the other EU countries more or less said, "Can you talk to Washington for us. They might listen to you, a little." So Jack Straw wrote the letter asking for clarification...
Condi's approach strikes me as a classic example of that whole, "You're either with us or you're against us!" philosophy which Shrub came out with around the time when the US invaded Afghanistan. Computer geeks should be pleased: they are attempting to impose digital conditions on the analogue mess of international relations.
no subject
I apologise to the rest of you, inasmuch as I failed to work sufficiently hard against Bush's elections.