possibly the stupidest "my editor is better than yours" argument I've seen yet
Emacs makes you more prone to RSI than vi, apparently. Funny, given that, for example, vi's Open new line (O), Append to current line (A), Change entire line after cursor (C), switch to ex mode (:), Paste before current line (P), Switch case under cursor (~), and Goto end of file (G) all require me to use the shift key, which is going to give me at least a similar amount of grief - and these are all commands I'd use regularly, not deliberately chosen counter-examples. For comparison's sake, the equivalent Emacs keystrokes would be C-o, C-e (moves cursor to end of line; Emacs doesn't do the "now we are typing/now we are editing modal stuff"), C-k, no equivalent, C-y, ESC-u1, ESC->. If you're getting RSI from your computer, try taking a break now and again.
1. Actually, this may account in part for my lack of Emacs-generated RSI: I originally learned to use it using very, very dumb terminal emulators and thus never learned any of the Alt/Meta invocations, instead learning them as ESC-<character>. For me, this forces a sizeable move away from hands-at-rest rather than trying to hit a key that, on this keyboard, is actually under my palm, in combination with some other key. Of course, if I had ever learned to type correctly, I'd be holding down modifier keys with one hand and the, ah, modified keys with the other.
1. Actually, this may account in part for my lack of Emacs-generated RSI: I originally learned to use it using very, very dumb terminal emulators and thus never learned any of the Alt/Meta invocations, instead learning them as ESC-<character>. For me, this forces a sizeable move away from hands-at-rest rather than trying to hit a key that, on this keyboard, is actually under my palm, in combination with some other key. Of course, if I had ever learned to type correctly, I'd be holding down modifier keys with one hand and the, ah, modified keys with the other.
no subject
no subject
no subject
By the way, I can't believe there's really a University of Limerick. Did you guys study the Man from Nantucket, there? *rofl*
no subject
no subject
Sorry you didn't find my limerick thing funny. :-) I just couldn't resist.
chording, crtl vs caps lock
(Anonymous) 2005-08-02 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)(hi waider, kor here!)
Re: chording, crtl vs caps lock
Why does this matter? Suppose you prefer using your right pinky to depress the Shift and Control keys. What do you bind Control to, then?
Re: chording, crtl vs caps lock
(Anonymous) 2005-08-03 08:59 am (UTC)(link)For rightly-built folk though, having only one control key, and it in place of the standard pc caps lock key, just works. I've never had reason to reach for the other ctrl. Funny, that. Hmmm. Maybe it's not a universal solution though, maybe it's just me. Try it though!
Re: chording, crtl vs caps lock
(Anonymous) 2005-08-03 01:36 pm (UTC)(link)The truth is, I'm not a lefty. However, people who say "take frequent breaks to avoid RSI" are pussies. In order to "go the distance" I find myself (after 15 years of touch-typing) automatically balancing typing with both hands: I don't favor one over the other while typing.
Symmetry of the keyboard really helps me, here. I often alternate which pinky I use to press "shift" with, and now that I'm paying conscious attention to it, I seem to be using the right pinky more than the left.
And, I'm a vi user -- so, I don't spend much time mashing that Control key. I also notice that when I do, I typically use my left pinky. I also have particularly short pinkies -- perfect for typing, bad for playing piano -- so tucking it down left to get at the Control key doesn't require much wrist torsion for me. Probably another reason why I've avoided RSI for so long.
Re: chording, crtl vs caps lock