waider: (Default)
waider ([personal profile] waider) wrote2004-02-13 09:53 am
Entry tags:

open-source Windows

Hackers with the code could exploit the operating system and access machines running Windows.
  • ...like everyone does with OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux, MacOS X (well, the Darwin core, anyway)
  • ...which they're not able to do right now
  • ...as soon as they stop laughing
ext_8707: Taken in front of Carnegie Hall (evil)

[identity profile] ronebofh.livejournal.com 2004-02-13 10:04 am (UTC)(link)
An ex-haxx0r-kiddie-now-security-tiger-type friend of mine got a hold of the code. He's going to audit it with a friend, he says. It should be interesting, and riddled with buffer overflow vulnerabilities, of course.

obscurity leak

[identity profile] tongodeon.livejournal.com 2004-02-13 10:21 am (UTC)(link)
Microsoft calls this a security leak. Of course if they've got tons of buffer overflows that nobody knows about, that's not security: that's obscurity. They don't have a security leak, they have an obscurity leak.

[identity profile] bitpuddle.livejournal.com 2004-02-13 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
It is more like, "UNIX developers all over the world will wonder at the sheer number of macros in Win32 code."

Re:

[identity profile] candice.livejournal.com 2004-02-13 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay. Have you ever -looked- at the source code to unixes?
Everything has a few macro-happy people on it, as far as I can tell.
ext_181967: (Default)

[identity profile] waider.livejournal.com 2004-02-14 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, C-Kermit.

Re:

[identity profile] bitpuddle.livejournal.com 2004-02-14 06:32 am (UTC)(link)
Nothing like Win32. It gets scary.