ext_2403 ([identity profile] mskala.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] waider 2004-04-30 09:38 am (UTC)

There was an IP that was hitting my Supreme Court RSS feed (an especially fat one because it contains a paragraph of legalese for every entry) twice a minute, 24/7. That feed updates once a day at the absolute most because that's when the script that generates it runs, and seldom that frequently in practice, usually more like once a week, because that's when the Web site it's watching updates. So I stuck the offending IP in my .htaccess with instructions to return 403 forbidden.

Several months later I got an email from the admin of that IP asking about it; I explained the reason for the block, he said he'd make his script behave, and so I removed the block.

IMHO, this is the way such things ought to work. I'm hesitant to try to make official Rules for dealing with such situations, and since the point of providing RSS feeds is to increase readership of the stuff I'm publishing, it would seem foreign to me to cry too many tears if in fact the readership does increase. If the traffic got to be more than I wanted to pay for, I'd start selling ad space.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org